The conversation around artificial intelligence in music has taken another significant turn, but not in the way many expected. TIDAL isn't banning AI-generated music from its platform, nor is it telling artists they can't use artificial intelligence in their creative process. Instead, the streaming service is changing something far more important: who gets paid.

Beginning July 15, 2026, TIDAL will stop monetizing music that is created entirely by artificial intelligence. Those songs can still be uploaded, streamed, and discovered by listeners, but they will no longer generate royalties or qualify for direct-to-fan sales. Tracks identified as fully AI-generated will also carry a visible "AI" label, while songs that imitate or impersonate real artists through artificial intelligence will be removed altogether.

For musicians, producers, and creators using platforms like Suno and Udio, the announcement immediately raises a series of pressing questions. Is TIDAL banning AI music? Can artists who use AI still earn royalties? What exactly counts as "fully AI-generated"? And could other streaming services follow the same path?

While TIDAL has answered some of those questions, many remain unresolved. What is clear, however, is that this policy represents one of the clearest attempts yet to redefine artificial intelligence's place in the music industry, not by rejecting the technology, but by reshaping the financial incentives behind it.

Jay-Z’s music streaming service, TIDAL has made its foray into the African market
Subscription-based music streaming service, TIDAL owned by American music rapper, Jay-Z has made its foray into the African market through a partnership with Africa’s leading telecommunications operator, MTN. The music streaming service, which has launched in Uganda, provides MTN Uganda over 10 million subscribers a variety of
TechloyTechloy

Subscribe for free to continue reading this article

Subscribe Subscribe

Already Have an Account? Log In